2026 Report on Investor Relations and Token Transparency in the Cryptocurrency Industry
Author: Connor King, Founder of Novora
Compiled by: Hu Tao, ChainCatcher
Last month, we released "Is Investor Relations Important in the Cryptocurrency Space," which is a follow-up report. We expanded from the initial dataset of 53 protocols to over 150 protocols, covering all major sectors: DEX, lending, perpetual contracts, liquid staking, L1, L2, bridges, DePIN, AI, stablecoins, infrastructure, and CEX tokens. The fully diluted valuation (FDV) of the protocols ranges from $40 million to $4.5 billion.
We examined 15 binary, verifiable metrics for each protocol: Does the protocol disclose this information? Yes/No. Each data point was cross-verified through public sources: Artemis, Tokenterminal, Blockworks, Dune, DefiLlama.
We found the following:
Less than 1% disclose market maker terms.
50 protocols. Daily trading volume totals in the billions of dollars. Yet only one protocol publicly disclosed information about its market-making arrangements.
Market makers set the terms for token trading. These arrangements typically include token lending, option structures, and performance incentives, all of which directly affect price discovery. In traditional markets, such important agreements are disclosed. However, in the cryptocurrency market, every market participant trades under conditions of information opacity.
Meteora is the only protocol that disclosed its market-making arrangements through its 2025 token holder annual report. Only one out of over 150 protocols.
This represents the most significant transparency gap in the industry.
91% of companies have revenue data. 3% of companies have investor relations centers.
Almost all protocols in this audit publicly provide revenue data through third-party platforms or their own dashboards. The raw data exists.
However, only 3% of companies have established dedicated investor relations centers that integrate this data into an investor-facing experience. Exception protocols include Meteora, Jito, Jupiter, Raydium, MetaDAO. All other protocols scatter information across blogs, governance forums, X threads, and third-party platforms. There is no centralized, institutional-level investor experience. The gap lies not in the availability of data, but in the communication infrastructure.
9% submitted Blockworks TTF
The Blockworks Token Transparency Framework (TTF) was submitted to the SEC in June 2025, covering 18 disclosure standards related to supply, distribution, finance, and market structure, supported by Pantera, L1D, and Theia. Among the 150+ protocols audited, only 13 submitted this framework: Jito, Jupiter, Raydium, Morpho, Aerodrome, MetaDAO, Maple, dYdX, Euler, Marinade, EtherFi, Gains Network, and Meteora.
This is a substantial improvement from zero submissions. However, the submission rate dropped from 25% when there were initially 53 protocols to 9% with over 150. The original dataset favored early adopters of TTF in DeFi protocols. After expanding the sample, the situation became clearer: the vast majority of protocols in the market did not choose to participate. Zero L1, zero L2, and zero infrastructure protocols submitted the framework. The framework exists, and more protocols should utilize it.
38% have active value capture, 62% return nothing
We define "active value capture" broadly: Does the protocol have at least one operational mechanism that directs economic value directly to token holders (excluding governance rights)? Among the 150+ protocols, we identified six different models:
- Direct fee distribution (JUP, DYDX, GMX)
- Buyback and burn (HYPE, RAY, MET)
- Staking income sharing (PENDLE, AAVE, ETHFI)
- Conditional buyback (LDO)
- ve model periodic distribution (AERO)
- Governance only, no economic rights (MORPHO, LINK, ARB)
62% of protocols fall into the last category—governance rights only, with no value capture, including some of the largest market cap projects in the industry. The differences across sectors are very pronounced: 62% of perpetual contract protocols have active value capture, while only 12% of L1/L2 tokens do. The perpetual contract sector views aligning token holder interests as a competitive advantage, while L1 foundations have yet to do so. We will release an in-depth analysis of which models are truly effective next week.
The data layer is built, but the communication layer is not
We examined five major third-party platforms: Token Terminal, Dune Analytics, Artemis, DefiLlama, and Blockworks Research. The first four platforms each cover 85-95% of the dataset. 72% of protocols appear on four or more platforms simultaneously. Every protocol in the audit appears on at least one platform. The raw data infrastructure for institutional analysis is largely in place. What is missing is the interpretation, packaging, and communication layer that transforms data into investable narratives.
The complete disclosure status of over 150 protocols is as follows:
<1% ------ Disclose market maker terms
3% ------ Dedicated IR center
3% ------ Provide a one-page overview
5% ------ Dedicated investor channel
7% ------ Publish single token metrics
8% ------ Token holder report
9% ------ Submit TTF
15% ------ Disclose exchange listing information
18% ------ Quarterly updates
35% ------ Revenue itemized disclosure
38% ------ Active value capture
88% ------ Disclose circulation
91% ------ Revenue data available
What this means
The argument in "Is Investor Relations Important in the Crypto Space?" still holds. With the sample size expanded to over 150, the data is even more alarming. Crypto protocols are not hiding fundamentals; they simply fail to present them. There is already raw input for fundamental analysis on-chain and on third-party platforms, but the "translation layer" and IR infrastructure that converts data into institutional confidence is almost nonexistent. Only 3% have IR centers, <1% disclose market maker terms, and 91% of the market have not adopted the only available standardized disclosure framework.
The opportunity for protocols is very clear: the cost of building IR infrastructure is negligible compared to the capital market benefits. Protocols that invest in this now will be the first to gain the trust of institutional allocators. The complete interactive report covering all 150+ protocols is now live:
http://novora.co/research/ir-transparency-2026.html
Next week, we will release a comparative report in this series: "Which Token Value Capture Model Works?" This report will detail the six token value capture mechanisms we identified, their empirical performance, and what this means for token classification and institutional adoption.
You may also like

Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.

Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.

White House Discusses CLARITY Act With Law Enforcement Ahead of Senate Vote
The White House discussed the CLARITY Act with law enforcement ahead of a Senate vote, focusing on illicit finance risks and developer protections.

$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage

Bitcoin Trading Guide 2026: Strategies for Experienced Traders

What Is XAUT and PAXG? Why Tokenized Gold Is Booming in 2026

Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."

Will the SpaceX IPO Hurt Bitcoin? Here's What Traders Are Watching

Foreign selling in the South Korean stock market accelerates, with cumulative net sales reportedly reaching $75 billion this year
On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.

Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows
Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.

Ferrari Challenge Le Mans: Carl Moon to Dominate in WEEX Livery

Sahara AI Responds to SAHARA’s Sharp Drop: No Contract or Product Security Issues Found, Internal Investigation Underway
Sahara AI responded to SAHARA’s 60% price drop, saying no token contract or product security issues have been found and an internal investigation is underway.

WEEX Deposit/Withdrawal Dynamic Island: Your Asset Status, Always in Sight

Scaling Crypto Derivatives: The Digital Asset Infrastructure Behind High-Volume Trading
In the fast-moving digital asset ecosystem, derivatives platforms face an extreme architectural test. High-leverage futures markets demand more than just standard security—they require absolute operational precision, zero-latency matching engines, and ironclad structural scalability, all while navigating intense market volatility.
As global platforms scale to meet these demands, the industry is shifting away from rigid, monolithic setups toward a more agile, "decoupled" infrastructure philosophy.
The Blueprint for High-Volume Copy TradingFor elite global exchanges like WEEX (founded in 2018), this architectural choice becomes critical when scaling high-volume retail features like social copy trading. When thousands of users automatically mirror the real-time strategies of elite traders simultaneously, it triggers sudden, monumental spikes in concurrent transactional volume.
To prevent execution latency or settlement bottlenecks during these peak volatility events, a platform's primary engine must remain entirely dedicated to risk management, copy-trade synchronization, and order matching.
The Architectural Rule: New-generation platforms must separate front-end user execution engines from heavy backend infrastructural overhead to eliminate operational friction.
By separating these layers, platforms can maintain complete sovereignty over their trading environments and user experiences while strategically aligning with institutional-grade infrastructure ecosystems. This strategic framework allows modern exchanges to leverage advanced Digital Asset Custody infrastructure such as Cobo’s behind the scenes, ensuring that backend wallet management scales elastically alongside trading spikes.
Capitalizing on Market Momentum and 400× LeverageIn a derivatives arena where platforms offer up to 400× leverage on perpetual contracts, capital efficiency and market agility are core business metrics. To capture market momentum, an exchange needs the ability to rapidly expand its asset offerings, supporting everything from legacy crypto assets to sudden, trending altcoins across a massive library of trading pairs.
Adopting a flexible, scalable Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) solution such as Cobo’s could completely rewrite the development timeline for high-growth exchanges. Instead of spending months of engineering capital building out custom backend wallet architectures for every new blockchain network, platforms can deploy localized infrastructure in days.
This agility allows platforms to instantly scale their listings to over a thousand trading pairs without compromising security or delaying time-to-market. It mirrors the exact operational advantages seen during high-velocity market events, similar to how advanced wallet infrastructure empowers platforms during sudden asset surges; allowing exchanges to pass that speed and liquidity directly to their global user base.
A Mature Foundation for GrowthThe synergy between trusted infrastructure ecosystems and global trading platforms represents the natural evolution of a maturing crypto market. As WEEX continues to scale its global spot and derivatives offerings for over 6 million users, adopting robust backend paradigms proves that platforms no longer have to compromise between cutting-edge trading velocity and uncompromised structural security.

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

Get Paid to Onboard? Try WEEX’s New Homepage with Rewards for Registration, Deposit & Trade

WEEX Custom Layout: Build Your Perfect Trading Workspace in Seconds
Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.
Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.
White House Discusses CLARITY Act With Law Enforcement Ahead of Senate Vote
The White House discussed the CLARITY Act with law enforcement ahead of a Senate vote, focusing on illicit finance risks and developer protections.




